X (formerly Twitter) has recently updated its reply feature, replacing “Show more comments” with “Show probable spam.” This change has raised concerns about the accuracy of the spam detection, with users reporting that legitimate responses are being classified as potential spam. The new feature aims to filter out aggressive language and spam, but seems to struggle with precision.
In this article, we will explore the details of this update, the implications for users, and offer guidance on how to navigate the new “Show probable spam” feature.
- Twitter has changed the “Show more comments” feature to “Show probable spam”, raising concerns about the accuracy of spam detection.
- The new “Show probable spam” feature has incorrectly classified some non-spam replies as spam, leading to concerns about the reliability of the system.
- The “Show more replies (including potentially abusive content)” feature includes more aggressive and irrelevant replies, though it may be more accurate than the “Show probable spam” option.
- Users are advised to double-check replies marked as potential spam, as the system may not accurately identify all spam while also incorrectly flagging some legitimate replies.
- Several issues related to the Twitter platform, such as inability to view liked posts, blocked profiles, and removed blocking/muting functionality, have been reported by users.
- 【X(Formerly Twitter)】What is the “Show Probable Spam” Feature on X?
- 【X(Formerly Twitter)】Displaying Potentially Abusive Replies
- 【X(Formerly Twitter)】Addressing Issues with the “Show Probable Spam” Feature
- Q&A: “【X (former Twitter)】 Displaying Potential Spam Replies – Includes Regular Replies”
- Public Opinion: “【X (former Twitter)】 Displaying Potential Spam Replies – Includes Regular Replies” A Concerning Lack of Accuracy in Twitter’s Spam Detection
【X(Formerly Twitter)】What is the “Show Probable Spam” Feature on X?
Changes to the Reply Section on X
Around June 14, 2024, the “Show more comments” feature on the reply section of X (formerly Twitter) was changed to “Show probable spam”. This change has raised concerns about the accuracy of the spam detection.
Identifying Spam Replies
The “Show probable spam” feature was found to classify various types of replies as potential spam, including impression-driven spam, random alphanumeric or Japanese text, abusive language, URLs-only, emoji-only, and irregularly formatted text. However, the detection accuracy was reported to be lacking, as genuine comments like jokes or expressions were also identified as spam, and some impression-driven spam was not detected.
Potential Issues with the “Show Probable Spam” Feature
Users have expressed concerns that the “Show probable spam” feature may inadvertently hide legitimate replies, especially for short or single-word comments. In such cases, users are advised to mention the original poster to ensure their reply is seen.
【X(Formerly Twitter)】Displaying Potentially Abusive Replies
Expanded “Show Probable Spam” Option
Within the “Show probable spam” feature, there is an option to “Show more replies (including potentially abusive content)”. This expanded option includes replies with more aggressive language, posts unrelated to the original content (such as sudden advertisements or quotes), and clear spam that can be easily identified.
Accuracy Concerns
While this expanded option appears to have better accuracy than the general “Show probable spam” feature, some instances of false positives have been reported. It is generally recommended to avoid opening this expanded view, as it may contain more potentially harmful content.
【X(Formerly Twitter)】Addressing Issues with the “Show Probable Spam” Feature
Android Version Problems
Users have reported issues with the “Show Probable Spam” feature on the Android version of X, including the inability to see who has liked their posts.
Resolving Profile and Blocking Issues
Other problems identified include the inability to access profiles from advertisements, block users, and mute or block content from the timeline or conversations.
Potential Solutions
- Disconnecting linked applications that may be causing spam issues
- Reporting any persistent problems with the “Show Probable Spam” feature to the X support team
- Staying vigilant and manually checking for potential false positives in the “Show Probable Spam” section
| Related Articles |
|---|
|
“I tapped on the ‘Show Probable Spam’ option and most of the replies weren’t spam at all, but the ones that were clearly spam were just left out in the open. What’s the deal with that? I’m definitely not paying for this service.”
— boniprin (@merfuma), June 14, 2024
The recent changes to the “Show more comments” feature on X (formerly Twitter) have raised concerns about the accuracy of spam detection. While the platform’s attempt to filter out potentially spammy replies is commendable, the implementation appears to be flawed, leading to the display of legitimate comments as “probable spam.” This inconsistency has understandably frustrated users, as they find themselves having to manually sift through the hidden replies to engage with genuine discussion. The inclusion of potentially aggressive content within the “Show more comments” section further exacerbates the problem, as users may be hesitant to explore these hidden interactions. Overall, this feature update seems to have fallen short of its intended purpose, highlighting the need for more refined and reliable spam detection algorithms, as well as better transparency in the platform’s content moderation practices. As X (formerly Twitter) continues to evolve, it will be crucial for the company to address these issues and provide users with a more seamless and trustworthy experience.
Q&A: “【X (former Twitter)】 Displaying Potential Spam Replies – Includes Regular Replies”
What is “Show probable spam” on X (former Twitter)?
Around June 14, 2024, the “Show more comments” feature on X (former Twitter) was changed to “Show probable spam”. This change has raised concerns about the accuracy of the spam detection, with some users reporting that “normal replies were classified as spam” and “impressions got through”.
How accurate is the spam detection on X (former Twitter)?
The spam detection accuracy seems to have some issues. While it does classify spam such as impression-seeking posts, random alphanumeric or Japanese text, abusive language, URL-only posts, and irregular text, it also incorrectly flags some non-spam replies like jokes and short comments as potential spam. Additionally, some actual spam posts are not being detected.
What about the “Show more replies (including potentially abusive content)” feature on X (former Twitter)?
The “Show more replies (including potentially abusive content)” option within the “Show probable spam” feature tends to display more overtly abusive language, posts unrelated to the original tweet (such as sudden advertisements or quote-only replies), and content that is clearly identifiable as spam. While there are still some cases of false positives, this option generally has higher accuracy than the standard “Show probable spam” setting, so it is recommended to avoid opening these expanded replies.
Public Opinion: “【X (former Twitter)】 Displaying Potential Spam Replies – Includes Regular Replies” A Concerning Lack of Accuracy in Twitter’s Spam Detection
This is a concerning issue. It seems Twitter’s spam detection algorithm is quite flawed, often categorizing regular replies as potential spam. This not only inconveniences users but also raises questions about the platform’s ability to effectively moderate content. While the intention to reduce spam is understandable, the poor accuracy of the system is unacceptable and will likely frustrate many users.
Questionable Decisions by Twitter’s Engineers
Wow, the Twitter engineers really dropped the ball on this one. Implementing a spam detection system that consistently misclassifies normal replies as spam is a huge misstep. It’s almost as if they didn’t even bother testing it properly before rolling it out. They need to go back to the drawing board and figure out how to improve the accuracy, otherwise users are going to lose faith in the platform’s moderation capabilities.
Twitter Continues to Disappoint with Technical Issues
Yet another technical problem from Twitter, what a surprise. This spam detection system is clearly not ready for prime time, and it’s just the latest in a long line of issues the platform has faced. One has to wonder if the engineers at Twitter are even competent at their jobs. At this point, I’m not confident they can fix this problem in a timely and effective manner.
A Necessary Evil, but Executed Poorly
I understand the need for Twitter to implement spam detection measures, but this current implementation is just terrible. Misclassifying legitimate replies as spam is going to cause a lot of frustration for users. Twitter needs to go back to the drawing board and figure out how to improve the accuracy of their system. Otherwise, this “feature” is going to do more harm than good.
Twitter’s Spam Detection Leaves Much to be Desired
I’m really disappointed to see how poorly Twitter’s spam detection is working. Mistaking normal replies for spam is unacceptable and shows a clear lack of quality control. If they can’t even get this basic moderation function right, it makes me question Twitter’s overall competence as a platform. They need to urgently address this issue before it erodes even more user trust.